Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether motor vehicle seats manufactured as latex foam sponge were classifiable under Tariff Item 16-A(1) of the erstwhile Tariff Act or under Tariff Item 34-A as parts and accessories of motor vehicles.
Analysis: The dispute related to reclassification of the goods for the period in question. The issue had already been decided in the assessee's own case by the Apex Court, which had rejected the Revenue's stand under Tariff Item 16-A(1) and upheld classification under Tariff Item 34-A. As the facts and period were covered by that decision, the same reasoning governed the present appeal.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Tariff Item 34-A and not under Tariff Item 16-A(1), and the assessee succeeded.