Non-speaking appellate order on Modvat credit violates natural justice and is set aside for fresh disposal.

An appellate order rejecting Modvat credit was held unsustainable because it merely repeated the adjudicating officer's findings, gave no independent reasoning, and failed to deal with the assessee's submissions. An appellate authority must disclose the basis of its conclusions so the decision can be examined in further appeal; a non-speaking order that does not reveal its reasoning process violates natural justice. The defective order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh disposal after hearing the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellate order rejecting Modvat credit was liable to be set aside for being a non-speaking order and for failure to deal with the assessee's submissions.

Analysis: The appellate authority merely repeated the findings of the adjudicating officer and did not disclose any independent reasoning or deal with the submissions made by the assessee. An appellate order is expected to reflect the basis on which the conclusions are reached so that the correctness of the decision can be examined in further appeal. An order which does not reveal the reasoning process is contrary to the requirements of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Conclusion: The order was held defective and was set aside. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh disposal after hearing the assessee.

---