Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether removal of alarm clock parts in kit form could be treated as removal of one day alarm time pieces under Notification No. 72/86 and whether the matter required remand for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The goods admittedly were not cleared as fully assembled alarm clocks. The record showed that the dispute turned on whether packing all the parts in kit form amounted to a new product or to a complete alarm clock for the purpose of the notification. The classification issue had not been finally determined by the adjudicating authority, particularly in relation to the distinction between one day alarm time pieces and other goods covered by the notification. Following the approach in Hawkins Cookers, the matter required a factual determination on whether a new product came into existence and how the goods were to be classified.
Conclusion: The issue was not finally decided on merits and the matter had to be remanded for de novo adjudication.