Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported ruby laser was classifiable as a surgical laser eligible for exemption under Notification No. 20/1999, and whether deposit of the demanded duty should be waived pending appeal.
Analysis: The exemption dispute turned on the character of the laser and its intended use. The Department treated the removal of hair, tattoos, and pigmented lesions as outside the scope of surgery, while the applicant relied on medical literature, the manufacturer's brochure, and the manufacturer's certification showing medical use of the equipment. On that basis, the Tribunal found it appropriate to grant interim protection and accept continuation of the existing bank guarantee.
Conclusion: The Tribunal granted waiver of deposit of the duty and stayed recovery pending appeal.