Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the know-how fee paid to the foreign collaborator was includible in the assessable value of the imported proprietary equipment under Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.
Analysis: Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) requires inclusion in the price of imported goods of the value of engineering, development, design, plans and sketches undertaken abroad and necessary for production of the imported goods, where such value is not already included in the price. The agreement and related clauses showed that the proprietary equipment was manufactured according to drawings, designs and technical specifications supplied abroad, that those materials formed part of the know-how package, and that the importer had effectively borne their cost through the lump sum know-how payment. The payment therefore represented an indirect supply of design and related technical inputs to the foreign manufacturer, bringing the amount within the rule.
Conclusion: The know-how fee was correctly added to the assessable value and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are manufactured abroad on the basis of design, engineering and technical inputs supplied through a know-how arrangement, and the importer has borne their cost, such value is includible in the assessable value if not already reflected in the import price.