TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the amount paid towards basic engineering and design charges was includible in the assessable value of the imported goods; (ii) whether technical know-how fees were includible in the assessable value of the imported goods.
Issue (i): whether the amount paid towards basic engineering and design charges was includible in the assessable value of the imported goods.
Analysis: The payment for basic engineering and design was found to relate to the overall setting up of the palm oil plant, including layout drawings, workshop drawings, technical documentation, and other plant-related specifications. The imported goods were only a small component of the project, and the record did not establish that the engineering charges were paid for the production of the imported equipment or as a condition of their sale. In the absence of proof of a direct nexus with the imported goods, the addition could not be sustained under the valuation rules.
Conclusion: The basic engineering and design charges were not includible in the assessable value and the finding was in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): whether technical know-how fees were includible in the assessable value of the imported goods.
Analysis: The technical know-how related to the broader plant project and post-import activities, not to the imported equipment itself. The agreement and surrounding documents did not show that the fee was payable as a condition of sale of the imported goods, nor that it satisfied an obligation of the seller in relation to those goods. Accordingly, the requirements for addition under the valuation provisions were not met.
Conclusion: The technical know-how fees were not includible in the assessable value and the finding was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The valuation adopted by the adjudicating authority could not be sustained to the extent it loaded the engineering and design charges, and the revenue's challenge to exclusion of technical know-how fees also failed. The invoice price alone was accepted as the transaction value.
Ratio Decidendi: Amounts incurred for plant-level engineering, design, or technical know-how are not includible in the value of imported goods unless they are shown to have a direct nexus with the imported goods and to be payable as a condition of sale.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
