Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the earlier dismissal of the appeals for defects deserved to be recalled and the appeals restored to their original numbers. (ii) Whether Modvat credit was admissible on spare parts, components and accessories brought into the factory and used in machines installed prior to 1-3-1994.
Issue (i): Whether the earlier dismissal of the appeals for defects deserved to be recalled and the appeals restored to their original numbers.
Analysis: The defects pointed out by the Registry had been cured, and the application for restoration was pressed so that the appeals could be decided on merits.
Conclusion: The restoration application was allowed and the earlier dismissal order was recalled.
Issue (ii): Whether Modvat credit was admissible on spare parts, components and accessories brought into the factory and used in machines installed prior to 1-3-1994.
Analysis: The issue was covered by earlier Tribunal decisions and the authorities had followed those decisions in allowing the benefit. No ground was made out to take a different view.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was held to be admissible and the Revenue appeals were rejected.
Final Conclusion: The restoration was granted, but on merits the Revenue challenge failed and the orders allowing Modvat credit were sustained.