Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether measuring instruments were eligible for Modvat credit as inputs under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, when the claim under Rule 57Q as capital goods had been rejected.
Analysis: The question was held to be covered by an earlier Tribunal decision dealing with measuring instruments. That decision, reached after a reference to a Third Member, accepted the assessee's contention and was treated as binding. Following that precedent, the Tribunal declined to take a different view on the eligibility of the goods for credit under the Modvat scheme.
Conclusion: The claim that the measuring instruments could be treated as inputs eligible for Modvat credit was accepted, and the department's appeals were rejected.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the credit eligibility issue, and the departmental challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the point is squarely covered by a binding Tribunal decision, the same view must be followed in determining Modvat credit eligibility under the relevant rules.