Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether plastic cable ties imported by the appellant were freely importable as couplings or were restricted goods requiring a specific import licence, and whether the confiscation, penalty, and redemption fine were sustainable.
Analysis: The goods were examined as plastic ties with a notch and loose end used to secure bundles of cables. On the dictionary meanings relied upon, such articles did not answer the description of couplers or couplings. They were therefore classifiable as other plastic articles under the restricted import code, making a licence necessary for import. In the absence of such licence, confiscation for import control violation was justified. However, the dispute was held to be bona fide and without mala fide intent, which warranted relief in the matter of penalty and fine.
Conclusion: The goods were held to be licence-restricted and liable to confiscation. The personal penalty was set aside and the redemption fine was reduced.