Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 185/86-C.E. for goods falling under Item No. 68 of the erstwhile tariff.
Analysis: Notification No. 185/86-C.E. granted exemption to specified goods falling under the relevant tariff entry, but it was to be read with the notifications listed in its annexure. Those incorporated notifications extended relief only to specified categories such as goods manufactured by factories belonging to the Central Government or State Government, village industry goods, and goods covered by the prison-related notification. The appellants' factory did not fall within any of those notified categories.
Conclusion: The appellants were not entitled to the exemption and the claim for refund failed.