Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessable value of the imported car and the consequential redemption fine and penalty required reconsideration on account of deviation from the normal valuation practice.
Analysis: The valuation adopted by the Customs authorities was not in accordance with the normal practice of valuing imported cars with reference to the manufacturer's list price after permissible deductions. No justifiable reason was recorded for adopting a higher value inclusive of local taxes abroad. In these circumstances, the matter required reconsideration by the original authority, with the appellant being given an opportunity to present the case afresh.
Conclusion: The assessable value was directed to be refixed according to the norm, and the impugned orders were set aside with a remand to the original authority for fresh decision.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the valuation of imported goods departs from the normal valuation norm without recorded justification, the assessment is liable to be set aside and remanded for fresh determination after hearing the importer.