Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) concerning inclusion and amortisation of design and development charges in the assessable value of the machine called for interference.
Analysis: The order under challenge had upheld includibility of design and development charges in the assessable value, while remanding only for re-determination of the quantum with reference to the number of machines and the necessary nexus between the designs and the goods manufactured. On that basis, no legal infirmity or impropriety was found in the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order warranting Revenue's appeal.
Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge was rejected and the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was confirmed.