Alcohol-based tax classification for medicinal preparations upheld as a valid distinction with rational nexus to taxation.

A tax classification for spirituous medicinal preparations containing more than 12% alcohol was treated as constitutionally valid because it applied uniformly across systems of medicine and was based on an intelligible differentia with a rational nexus to the object of taxation. Ordinary Ayurvedic, Homeopathic and Unani medicines remained separately exempt, while higher-alcohol medicinal preparations were separately taxed. The earlier Ayurveda Pharmacy decision was distinguished because it dealt with a different statutory scheme in which Ayurvedic preparations were treated differently despite remaining medicinal preparations. The challenge to Item 67 under Article 14 therefore failed, and the reassessment directions were upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether Item 67 of the Schedule to the Assam Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1956, which taxes spirituous medicinal preparations containing more than 12% alcohol, is constitutionally valid under Article 14; and whether the decision in Ayurveda Pharmacy applied to invalidate that classification.

Analysis: The Schedule drew a distinction between ordinary Ayurvedic, Homeopathic and Unani medicines, which were generally exempt under Item 28, and spirituous medicinal preparations under any pharmacopoeia containing more than 12% alcohol, which were separately taxed under Item 67. The classification was based on the alcohol content of the preparation and operated across all systems of medicine, not only Ayurvedic medicines. Such a distinction was held to be founded on intelligible differentia and to bear a rational nexus with the object of taxation. The earlier decision in Ayurveda Pharmacy was found inapplicable because, on the Tamil Nadu provisions considered there, Ayurvedic preparations were singled out differently despite continuing to be medicinal preparations, whereas the Assam statute itself created a separate class for spirituous medicinal preparations containing higher alcohol content.

Conclusion: Item 67 was held valid and not violative of Article 14, and the challenge to the reassessment directions failed.

Final Conclusion: The appeals were allowed and the writ petitions challenging the tax classification were dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: A statutory tax classification based on the alcohol content of medicinal preparations is valid where it applies uniformly across comparable goods and rests on an intelligible differentia with a rational nexus to the tax levy.

---