Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the condition in the exemption notification denying the higher concessional rate to paper and paperboard manufacturers having an attached bamboo or wood pulp unit was arbitrary, discriminatory, or nexus with the object of the notification.
Analysis: The exemption notifications were part of a fiscal policy designed to encourage greater use of non-conventional raw materials and thereby conserve forest wealth and ecological balance. The impugned condition created a distinction between factories with attached conventional pulp units and factories without such units. The Court held that exemption notifications may be tested on the touchstone of Article 14, but only to examine whether the classification is reasonable, founded on intelligible differentia, and has a rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved. The distinction drawn by the notification was found to be meaningful because factories without attached bamboo or wood pulp units had less scope to rely on conventional raw materials, and the further concession was intended to promote a shift away from such materials.
Conclusion: The condition was held to be valid and non-arbitrary, and the challenge to the exemption notification failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A fiscal exemption notification may validly impose conditions and create classes, provided the classification is based on intelligible differentia and bears a rational nexus to the object of the exemption; such a condition is not struck down merely because it denies the concession to one class of manufacturers.