Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether machchar jali and hexagonal nets were classifiable under Heading 39.25 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as builders' wares or under Sub-heading 3926.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The products were claimed to be plastic netting cleared in rolls and not articles known in trade as builders' wares or as fencing, shutters, blinds or similar barriers. The Department did not adduce evidence to establish that the goods were understood in the market as falling within Heading 39.25 or that they were cleared in a form intended for specific use as insect screens or fencing. The classification principle applied was that tariff entry coverage must be shown by the Revenue, and a mere resemblance to a listed article is not enough where the evidence does not establish the market identity or specific character of the goods. The reasoning in the earlier decision on plastic meshes and nets was held applicable.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Sub-heading 3926.90 and not under Heading 39.25; the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, the Revenue must establish by evidence that the goods answer the description of the claimed entry in trade and market understanding, and absent such proof plastic nets cleared in roll form remain classifiable under the more appropriate general heading.