Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tool kits and jack assembly supplied with motor vehicles could be treated as inputs under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 so that a referable question of law arose.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the larger Bench had earlier examined the admissibility of Modvat credit on tool kits and jack assembly and had considered the Patna High Court decision on the subject. Even so, the present order records that the Tribunal had not fully agreed with that High Court view. On that basis, the question whether such items were inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of motor vehicles was treated as a debatable point of law requiring authoritative determination.
Conclusion: A question of law arose and the matter was required to be referred to the Allahabad High Court. The reference application was allowed.