Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a question of law arose for reference under section 35G where the dispute concerned eligibility of Wire Mesh and Felts as inputs for Modvat credit and the same legal issue had already been referred in another matter.
Analysis: The disputed goods were used as parts of machinery in the manufacture of paper and paper products. The Tribunal noted that an identical question regarding the scope of the exclusion clause in the Explanation to Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 had already been recognised and referred in another case involving similar inputs. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the present matter also gave rise to an identical question of law fit for reference to the High Court.
Conclusion: A question of law existed and the Revenue's reference application was allowed, with the matter directed to be referred to the High Court.