Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount standing to the credit of the assessee under the compulsory deposit scheme was liable to be excluded from net wealth under the Wealth-tax Act.
Analysis: The exclusion in the definition of assets under section 2(e)(2)(ii) applies to a right to an annuity that is not commutable into a lump sum grant. The amount under the compulsory deposit scheme was repayable in instalments and did not answer the statutory description of an excluded annuity. The deposit was also treated by section 7A of the Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income-tax Payers) Act, 1974 as a deposit with a banking company for the purpose of exemption, so it remained an asset liable to inclusion in net wealth, subject only to the exemption already allowed under section 5(1A).
Conclusion: The amount in the compulsory deposit scheme was not excluded from net wealth and was rightly includible, subject to the exemption limit already granted, in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A compulsory deposit under the scheme is an asset for wealth-tax purposes and is not excluded as an annuity under section 2(e)(2)(ii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957; it may be exempt only to the extent specifically provided by section 5(1A).