Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit under the relevant Central Excise notification in respect of inputs received from a 100% export oriented unit is to be restricted to the additional duty of customs leviable on like imported goods, or to the actual duty paid by the unit where that duty is lower.
Analysis: The governing notification was treated as materially identical to the predecessor notification considered by the Larger Bench. On that basis, the Tribunal applied the settled principle that duty on clearances by a 100% export oriented unit is not to be dissected into separate customs-duty components for the purpose of Modvat credit. The correct method is first to ascertain the additional duty of customs leviable on like imported goods and then compare it with the actual duty paid on the inputs cleared by the 100% export oriented unit. The available credit is confined to the extent permitted by the proviso to the notification, namely the lesser of the two figures.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to the credit already availed for March and April 1999, and the denial of credit from 28-2-1999 was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification restricts credit on inputs from a 100% export oriented unit to the additional duty leviable on like imported goods, the admissible credit is limited to the lesser of the additional duty payable on comparable imports and the actual duty paid by the unit.