Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in respect of inputs procured from a 100% Export Oriented Unit through a domestic buyer, the credit available to the manufacturer is confined to the additional duty of customs actually paid, or whether it extends to the amount equal to the additional duty of customs leviable on like imported goods.
Analysis: The relevant notifications and the larger bench ruling were applied to hold that clearances by a 100% EOU to the Domestic Tariff Area retain the character of excise duty, though the measure for computing credit is linked to the additional duty leviable under customs law. The ruling emphasised that the duty paid by the 100% EOU cannot be dissected into customs-duty components for restricting credit to the exact customs duty actually paid, and that the proviso governing credit limits it to the amount equal to the additional duty leviable on like goods. It was further noted that, in the absence of any contrary higher judicial authority, judicial discipline required following the larger bench view.
Conclusion: The credit was not confined to the additional duty of customs actually paid; it was admissible up to the amount equal to the additional duty of customs leviable. The assessee succeeded.