Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for valuing a house property lying vacant on the date of gift under rule 1BB of the Wealth-tax Rules, the gross maintainable rent should be based on the earlier rent fetched by the property or on the rent obtained immediately after the gift.
Analysis: Rule 1BB requires the gross maintainable rent to be the sum for which the house might reasonably be expected to let from year to year, and where the property is let, the actual rent received or receivable may be relevant. The property had been vacant on the date of gift, but was let out immediately thereafter to a Government department at a much higher rent. In the absence of evidence of comparable local rents, the later actual rent was treated as reliable evidence of the reasonable letting value. The presumption of continuity backwards under section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was applied to infer that the rent prevalent immediately after the gift could fairly indicate the rental value around the valuation date.
Conclusion: The maintainable rent was rightly taken on the basis of the rent of Rs. 7,000 per month, and the valuation under rule 1BB was upheld in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a house was vacant on the valuation date and is let out immediately thereafter, the subsequent actual rent may be used as evidence of its reasonable expected rent for valuation under rule 1BB, in the absence of contrary material.