Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in reducing the value of the gifted unquoted shares to Rs. 30 per share instead of adopting the valuation of Rs. 40.25 per share arrived at in accordance with rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957.
Analysis: The value of gifted property under section 6 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 has to be estimated on the basis of the price it would fetch in the open market on the date of the gift. In the absence of a specific rule under the Gift-tax Act for valuing unquoted shares, the valuation principle embodied in rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 was treated as the proper guide. The Tribunal was not entitled to depart from that recognised method and fix the value on an arbitrary basis by relying on the proposed legislation and its assumed impact on share value. The Court applied the accepted valuation approach for unquoted shares and held that the Tribunal had no discretion to substitute an unsupported figure.
Conclusion: The reduction to Rs. 30 per share was unjustified. The answer to question No. 6 was in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In valuing unquoted shares for gift-tax purposes, the open market value must be determined by a recognised valuation method, and the authority cannot fix an arbitrary figure when a settled statutory valuation principle is available.