Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether PCC beams manufactured by the assessee were covered by S. No. 8 of the Table to Notification No. 59/90 and entitled to exemption as intermediate and components of prefabricated buildings.
Analysis: S. No. 8 of the notification exempted only items which were intermediate and components of prefabricated buildings falling under Heading 94.06 of the Central Excise Tariff. The expression "prefabricated buildings" referred to buildings finished in the factory or assembled on site as complete elements. The assessee manufactured PCC beams, but was not engaged in the manufacture of prefabricated buildings and had not declared in the classification list that the beams were intermediate or component parts of such buildings. Mere use of the beams in construction did not satisfy the condition of the exemption.
Conclusion: The PCC beams were not covered by S. No. 8 of Notification No. 59/90 and the denial of exemption was .
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order denying the benefit of the exemption notification was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption under a tariff notification limited to intermediate and component goods of prefabricated buildings is available only when the goods are shown to satisfy that specific description and condition, not merely because they are used in construction.