Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported signal decoder was classifiable under Heading 85.28 as a reception apparatus for television or under Heading 85.29 as a part of satellite reception apparatus.
Analysis: The signal decoder did not itself receive television signals and was used between the satellite receiver and the television set to unscramble or decode encrypted signals. It was therefore not a satellite receiver falling under Heading 85.28. The relevant tariff entry for parts suitable for use solely or principally with apparatus of Headings 85.25 to 85.28 was Heading 85.29. The decoder was treated as an essential part of the satellite receiver system, and the alternative classification under the residual parts heading was accepted.
Conclusion: The imported signal decoder was classifiable under sub-heading 8529.90 of the Customs Tariff Act and not under sub-heading 8528.12; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an imported article does not itself perform the function of the principal apparatus but serves as an essential part of that apparatus, it is classifiable as a part of the apparatus under the relevant parts heading rather than as the apparatus itself.