Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CATV, MATV, TV signal booster and their parts were classifiable under Heading 85.29 as parts suitable for use solely or principally with apparatus of Headings 85.25 to 85.28, or under Heading 85.43 as electrical machines and apparatus having individual functions.
Analysis: For classification under Heading 85.29, the goods must first answer to the description of parts and must thereafter be shown to be suitable for use solely or principally with the specified apparatus. The impugned goods were found to have independent and distinct functions, were not shown to be integral portions of the television apparatus, and were treated as self-contained items that operate in conjunction with television equipment without becoming parts of it. Note 2 to Section XVI also required the goods to be parts before the question of suitability for use with a machine could arise. Goods having individual functions falling elsewhere in Chapter 85 were therefore not covered by Heading 85.29.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Heading 85.43 and not under Heading 85.29; the appeal failed.