Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether poppy husk falls within the expression "poppy straw" in Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and whether possession of poppy husk is punishable under that provision.
Analysis: "Poppy straw" is defined to mean all parts, except the seeds, of the opium poppy after harvesting, whether or not juice has been extracted. "Opium poppy" means the plant of the species Papaver. On that language, every part of the plant other than the seed is included in "poppy straw". The Court distinguished Section 15, which deals with poppy straw, from Section 18, which concerns opium and opium poppy. The percentage of morphine is relevant to offences involving opium, but not to Section 15. Since seed is the only excluded part, husk remains within the statutory expression "poppy straw".
Conclusion: Poppy husk falls within "poppy straw" under Section 15, and its possession attracts liability under that provision. The appeals failed.
Final Conclusion: The conviction under Section 15 was upheld because poppy husk was treated as part of poppy straw for the purposes of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, "poppy straw" includes all parts of the opium poppy except the seeds, so poppy husk is punishable under Section 15 without proof of any minimum morphine content.