Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether copper and copper alloy tubes and pipes manufactured before the introduction of the deeming provision treating redrawing as manufacture could be subjected to excise duty when cleared after that date.
Analysis: The goods were admittedly fully manufactured before Note 2 under Chapter 74 came into force and only their clearance took place later. A levy of excise duty cannot be fastened retrospectively on goods that were not liable when manufactured merely because a subsequent legal fiction later treated the activity as manufacture. The issue was covered by the principle that goods manufactured before the incidence of duty arises are not chargeable on later clearance.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to excise duty or special excise duty, and the revenue's challenge failed.