Prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit where excisable goods were destroyed by fire and documentary evidence supported remission.

Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 permits duty liability on shortages unless loss or destruction is explained to the satisfaction of the proper officer as arising from natural causes or unavoidable accident during handling or storage. On the facts, fire brigade, police and excise panchanamas, together with insurance material, supported destruction of the excisable goods by fire and showed no apparent criminal element. The adjudication findings on inadequate fire-fighting arrangements and an alleged electrical fault were not reflected in the show cause notice, which was issued long after the remission claim. A strong prima facie case was therefore made out for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the duty demand arising from destruction of excisable goods by fire.

Analysis: Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 contemplates duty liability on shortages unless the loss or destruction is explained to the satisfaction of the proper officer as resulting from natural causes or unavoidable accident during handling or storage. The record included the fire brigade certificate, police panchanama, excise panchanama and insurance material, all indicating that the goods were destroyed in a fire and that there was no apparent criminal element. The findings in the adjudication order regarding inadequate fire-fighting arrangements and alleged electrical fault were not borne out on the face of the show cause notice, and the notice itself was issued long after the remission claim.

Conclusion: The appellants established a strong prima facie case and were entitled to waiver of the pre-deposit and stay of recovery during the pendency of the appeal.

---