Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tundish nozzles used for transferring molten metal during manufacture were eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The Tribunal considered earlier decisions on the scope of the Explanation to Rule 57A. It noted that one line of authority had treated nozzles as falling within the excluded category, while a later coordinate Bench, relying on the Larger Bench ruling on the exclusion clause, had held that parts of machinery were not covered by that exclusion and could qualify as inputs. Following the later view, the Tribunal accepted that the nozzles were used in the manufacturing process for transferring molten metal from one stage to another and therefore answered the eligibility question in the assessee's favour.
Conclusion: The tundish nozzles were eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Final Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit on the nozzles was unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to relief in respect of that item.
Ratio Decidendi: Articles or components used in the manufacturing process are not denied Modvat credit merely because they are not consumables, where they do not fall within the statutory exclusion under the relevant explanation to the credit rule.