Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether PE steel tubes and SS tubes cold drawn, used as drill bars for tapping molten metal from a blast furnace, were admissible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A and allied relief under Rule 57H, or were excluded as tools.
Analysis: The goods were used with the drill machine for tapping operations and were consumed in the process, requiring replacement for each use. The decisive test applied was whether the article was a self-contained complete tool or merely a part used in the manufacturing process. Items that are not independent, complete units capable of performing a function on their own do not fall within the exclusion clause. The reasoning also treated the impugned tubes as comparable to parts of machinery rather than standalone tools, and relied on the principle that parts used in relation to manufacture remain eligible inputs where the exclusion clause is not attracted.
Conclusion: The tubes were held to be admissible Modvat inputs and not excluded as tools.
Ratio Decidendi: Articles that are merely parts of machinery and are used in or in relation to manufacture, but are not self-contained complete tools or appliances, are not hit by the exclusion clause to Rule 57A and qualify for Modvat credit.