Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bagasse generated during crushing of sugarcane is a final product so as to attract Rule 57CC(1) of the Central Excise Rules for the purpose of demanding duty and insisting on pre-deposit.
Analysis: Bagasse arose at the very first stage of extraction of juice from sugarcane, and no input was used in that mechanical process. Rule 57CC applies where a final product emerges from a process involving inputs on which Modvat credit under Rule 57A has been taken. On the facts, bagasse was a waste product and not a final product for the purpose of Rule 57CC(1). The earlier Tribunal view on a similar waste product supported the conclusion that the applicants had a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Bagasse was not a final product within Rule 57CC(1), and the applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.