Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery on the ground that press mud was waste and not a final product so as to attract Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The applicant's process of manufacture resulted in press mud as a by-product or waste, which was not treated as its final product. On this basis, the applicability of Rule 57CC was disputed. Considering the facts and circumstances, the balance of convenience was found to lie with the applicant.
Conclusion: Waiver of the entire pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.