TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether glass bangles and plastic bangles fall within the notified entries covering articles made of glass and articles made from plastic for the purpose of entry tax. (ii) Whether the rule of construction noscitur a sociis could be invoked to exclude bangles from the scope of those entries.
Issue (i): Whether glass bangles and plastic bangles fall within the notified entries covering articles made of glass and articles made from plastic for the purpose of entry tax.
Analysis: The notification under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 levied entry tax on glass sheets and all articles made of glass, and on plastic sheets, granules and articles made from all kinds of and all forms of plastic. The expression used was of wide import. In common parlance, glass bangles and plastic bangles are identified by the material from which they are made, and they are articles made of glass or plastic. The statutory language therefore embraced such bangles within the taxable entries.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue; glass bangles and plastic bangles were held liable to entry tax.
Issue (ii): Whether the rule of construction noscitur a sociis could be invoked to exclude bangles from the scope of those entries.
Analysis: The rule of noscitur a sociis applies only where the legislative intent is doubtful or the wider words are ambiguous. Here, the wording of the entries was clear and unambiguous, and the wider expressions were deliberately used to enlarge the scope of taxation. In such a situation, the rule could not be pressed into service to narrow the plain meaning of the notification.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue; noscitur a sociis was held inapplicable.
Final Conclusion: The challenged assessment and the High Court's decision upholding levy of entry tax on glass and plastic bangles were affirmed, and the appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where statutory or notified tax entries use clear and expansive language, a construction limiting their scope by noscitur a sociis is impermissible, and articles commonly identified by the material from which they are made fall within such entries.
TaxTMI 
