Classification dispute over copper wire bar moulds led to denial of stay on duty demand, while penalty protection was granted.

Classification of cut copper wire bar moulds used in manufacturing copper rods and later sold as scrap was treated as the core issue. The Tribunal noted a prima facie case that exemption Notifications Nos. 171/84 and 271/86 applied, but refused interim protection against the duty demand because the appellant had not disclosed all relevant material when the classification list was filed, so the time-bar plea was not accepted at the stay stage. Interim relief was therefore declined for the duty liability, while the penalty was stayed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to stay of the duty demand and whether the penalty deserved interim protection.

Analysis: The duty demand arose from classification of cut copper wire bar moulds used in manufacture of copper rods and later sold as scrap. The appellant had claimed exemption under Notifications Nos. 171/84 and 271/86, and the Tribunal found prima facie that those notifications were applicable to the case. The plea that the show cause notice was time-barred was also not accepted at the stay stage, since the appellant had not placed all relevant materials before the Department when the classification list was filed.

Conclusion: Interim relief was refused in relation to the duty demand, but the penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 was stayed.

Final Conclusion: The stay applications resulted in limited protection only, with the duty liability left undisturbed at the interim stage and the penalty suspended.

---