Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pressmud cleared from the factory was an excisable final product attracting the levy under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, or merely waste and refuse on which no duty was payable.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the dispute turned on the nature of pressmud and whether it could be treated as a final product for the purposes of Rule 57CC. Relying on earlier Tribunal decisions holding that pressmud was not marketable and therefore not excisable under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the Tribunal accepted that pressmud arising in sugar manufacture was only waste. On that basis, it could not be brought within Rule 57CC as an excisable final product.
Conclusion: The levy of Central Excise duty under Rule 57CC on pressmud was not sustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.