Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned orders determining the annual capacity of stenters were liable to be set aside for want of notice and hearing, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh decision.
Analysis: The orders had been passed without issuing a show cause notice and without affording the assessees an opportunity of being heard. The controversy also concerned whether closed spaces/ducting were to be excluded while computing annual capacity, as they were said not to aid heat setting or drying and not to constitute equipment within the meaning of the relevant notification. In these circumstances, the Tribunal set aside the determination and directed a fresh decision after hearing the appellants.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were invalidated and the matter was remanded for reconsideration after granting a proper hearing, in favour of the appellants.