Classification of unfinished castings turns on whether further machining is needed before they become usable machine parts.

Castings that emerge from moulds with only limited fettling or chipping remain classifiable as castings where they still require further machining before becoming usable machine parts. The governing approach is that intended end use in machinery does not by itself convert unfinished castings into identifiable parts of machinery. The note also records that the same classification view had previously been accepted in the appellants' own case and by the CBEC, supporting classification as castings rather than machinery parts.

---

---

Issues: Whether the goods manufactured as castings were classifiable as parts of machinery or as castings under the Central Excise Tariff.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the goods, after removal from moulds and limited fettling or chipping, had already acquired the essential character of identifiable machine parts. The Tribunal noted that in the appellants' own earlier case the same question had been decided in their favour. The relevant approach was that castings which still require further machining or processing before they become usable machine parts do not cease to be castings merely because they are ultimately intended for use in machinery. The earlier view had also been accepted by the CBEC, reinforcing the classification adopted in the appellants' favour.

Conclusion: The goods were held to be castings and not identifiable parts of machinery; the classification adopted by the Department was rejected and the appeals succeeded.

---