Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether unmachined and unfinished castings were classifiable as parts of machinery or vehicles, or whether their classification depended upon whether further machining was required before they could be used as such parts.
Analysis: The classification of the castings turned on their condition at the time of clearance and on whether they had already acquired the character of ready-to-use machine or vehicle parts. Unmachined and unfinished castings were treated as not classifiable as parts of machinery or vehicles so long as they still required further machining before use. As the factual position regarding any further machining at the customers' end was not established, the limited factual question needed determination before a final classification could be recorded.
Conclusion: The castings could not be classified as parts of machinery or vehicles merely on the basis of their unfinished state, if further machining was still required. The matter was remanded for de novo decision on the limited factual issue of their actual use and condition after clearance.