Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether iron and steel castings manufactured by the appellant were classifiable under Chapter 73 as raw castings or under Chapters 84 to 87 as machinery or motor vehicle parts.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the goods had remained unmachined castings and that only limited surface-related operations had been carried out. Relying on its earlier decision on similar facts, it applied the principle that castings continue to retain their identity as castings up to the stage of proof machining. It also noted that the departmental circular had accepted that view.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Chapter 73 and not under Chapters 84 to 87; the classification adopted by the appellant was accepted.