Customs pre-deposit relief limited where no prima facie case or financial hardship justified full waiver

Interim relief on a customs pre-deposit application was granted only in part. The applicants raised issues of classification, Rule 2(a) of the Interpretative Rules, HSN Explanatory Notes, alleged EXIM Policy breach, limitation, and the scope of the show cause notice, but those merits were not finally decided at this stage. The applicants failed to establish a case for complete waiver of the duty demand and did not plead financial hardship. A substantial pre-deposit of duty was therefore directed; on compliance, recovery of the balance duty and the entire penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the customs duty and penalty demanded in the adjudication order.

Analysis: The application was considered only at the interim stage. The dispute raised questions regarding classification, the effect of Rule 2(a) of the Interpretative Rules, the HSN Explanatory Notes, the alleged violation of the EXIM Policy, limitation, and the scope of the show cause notice, but those merits were not finally adjudicated. On the materials placed, the applicants did not establish a case for complete waiver of the duty amount, and they also did not plead financial hardship. The record indicated that the imported components were assembled into colour television sets, and the competing claims as to whether further working had taken place were left for regular hearing.

Conclusion: The appellants were directed to make a substantial pre-deposit of duty, and upon compliance the balance duty and entire penalty were stayed during pendency of the appeal.

Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted only to a limited extent, with the appeal itself left open for decision on merits after compliance.

---