Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the customs and central excise duty demands, along with penalties and confiscation, were sustainable when the unit had not commenced production or exports and no definite conclusion had been reached by the Development Commissioner.
Analysis: The governing circular provided that in the case of a 100% export-oriented unit, customs duty liability on duty-free imports arises upon de-bonding or upon violation or non-fulfilment of the exemption conditions. It further stated that show cause notice may be issued earlier, but the demand of duty should be confirmed only after a definite conclusion is reached by the Development Commissioner. As no such conclusion had been recorded and the validity period had been extended, the demand had been raised before the statutory and administrative precondition for confirmation was satisfied.
Conclusion: The duty demand was premature and unsustainable. The penalties and confiscation, being consequential, were also set aside, and the appeals were allowed.