Immediate suspension of Customs House Agent licence requires recorded urgency; absent that basis, the suspension fails.

Regulation 21(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 permits suspension of a Customs House Agent licence only where immediate action is justified by urgency. A suspension based on alleged misdeclaration and evasion in certain Bills of Entry was held unsustainable because the order did not record any concrete basis showing why urgent action was necessary, and it did not demonstrate application of mind to the jurisdictional requirement. The earlier suspension had already been set aside on the same ground, and the absence of any proceedings under Regulation 23 despite the passage of time further indicated no pressing necessity. The suspension order was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the suspension of the Customs House Agent licence under Regulation 21(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 was sustainable in the absence of disclosed necessity for immediate action.

Analysis: Regulation 21(2) permits suspension only where immediate action is on account of urgency. The impugned order was based on alleged misdeclaration and evasion in relation to certain Bills of Entry, but it did not record any concrete basis showing why immediate suspension was required. The earlier suspension had already been set aside on the same ground, and the fresh order also failed to disclose any independent reasons demonstrating urgency or application of mind to that jurisdictional requirement. The fact that no proceedings had been initiated under Regulation 23 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 despite passage of time reinforced the absence of pressing necessity.

Conclusion: The suspension order was unsustainable and was set aside.

---