TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the imported hot melt equipment was correctly classifiable under Heading 8424.20 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, or whether it could be classified under Heading 8479.40 or Heading 84.19; (ii) Whether the goods were eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 59/87-Cus. dated 01-03-1987.
Issue (i): Whether the imported hot melt equipment was correctly classifiable under Heading 8424.20 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, or whether it could be classified under Heading 8479.40 or Heading 84.19.
Analysis: The equipment was used in the cable manufacturing process to deliver molten adhesive through a heated hose and extrusion gun for application at the required place. Its essential character was not that of a cable making machine as such, nor did its principal function fall within Heading 84.19, which covers machinery for treatment of materials by a process involving change of temperature. The decisive feature was the spraying or application of hot adhesive through the gun nozzle, which brought the goods within Heading 8424.20 as a spraying appliance.
Conclusion: The classification under Heading 8424.20 was upheld and the claim for classification under Heading 8479.40 or Heading 84.19 was rejected.
Issue (ii): Whether the goods were eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 59/87-Cus. dated 01-03-1987.
Analysis: Serial No. 17 of the notification extended concessional treatment to mechanical appliances for spraying liquids or powders other than paint, varnish, oil, distemper or cement. The imported equipment was found to be a mechanical appliance used for applying molten adhesive, and the electricity was employed only for heating and maintaining the adhesive in molten condition. It was not covered by the exclusion relied upon by the department.
Conclusion: The goods were held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 59/87-Cus. dated 01-03-1987.
Final Conclusion: The tariff classification adopted by the department was sustained, but the assessee succeeded on the exemption notification issue, resulting in partial relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the essential function of imported equipment is the spraying or application of heated material through a nozzle, tariff classification follows that dominant function, and exemption for mechanical spraying appliances applies if the material is not one of the excluded categories.
TaxTMI 
