Modvat credit for machine accessory upheld where it controlled tool movement and numerical precision on the lathe.

An impugned machine accessory was treated as capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q(1)(b) because it was necessary for controlling cutting-tool movement and for numerical control of component size on a lathe machine. The record showed that the computerised functions improved the machine's efficiency and accuracy, and the Department produced no material to show otherwise. On that basis, accessories were regarded as within the scope of capital goods for Modvat credit, and the Revenue's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned machine accessory was eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q(1)(b).

Analysis: The accessory was found to be necessary for controlling the movement of cutting tools and for numerical control of component size on the lathe machine. The record showed that such computerised functions were used to make the machine efficient and accurate, and the Department produced no material to show that the item was not so used. In the absence of any legal or factual infirmity, the Tribunal upheld the view that accessories were covered within the scope of capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q(1)(b).

Conclusion: The accessory was held eligible for Modvat credit, and the Revenue's challenge failed.

---