Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was chargeable on duty payable on warehoused goods that were cleared within the permitted warehousing period but without payment of duty because of a court injunction, in the absence of an express statutory provision or court direction.
Analysis: Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 applies where warehoused goods are removed beyond the permitted period, and not to goods removed within the permitted period. Reading Sections 59 and 61 together, there was no statutory provision then in force authorising levy of interest in a situation where duty was withheld because of the court's injunction and was paid only after the levy was upheld. No direction for payment of interest had been made by the court.
Conclusion: Interest was not chargeable, and the answer to the reference was against the Revenue and in favour of the respondent.
Final Conclusion: In the absence of an express charging provision or judicial direction, no interest could be demanded on the delayed payment of duty in the facts of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest on customs duty cannot be levied for delayed payment in respect of warehoused goods cleared within the permitted period unless the statute expressly provides for such levy or the court has directed payment of interest.