Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible where subsidiary gate passes had been issued for part of the consignment and the original gate pass was endorsed for the remaining quantity.
Analysis: The relevant Board circular contemplated two possible courses where only part supplies were made from a consignment covered by a GP1 and no subsidiary gate pass had been issued for the supplied portion: the balance could either be covered by a subsidiary gate pass or the original gate pass could be endorsed for the remaining quantity. The circular was capable of more than one interpretation, but the construction that allowed endorsement of the original gate pass for the last balance quantity was a permissible reading. The departmental view proceeded on the mistaken assumption that issue of a subsidiary gate pass for the balance exhausted the possibility of endorsement, whereas the circular recognized both alternatives in the relevant situation.
Conclusion: The assessee's interpretation of the circular was accepted and Modvat credit was held admissible.