Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the expenditure incurred on the foreign trip undertaken to study technical know-how and new designs for manufacturing electric hoists was capital expenditure or revenue expenditure.
Analysis: The decisive test was the real nature and purpose of the expenditure. Expenditure laid out as part of the process of profit-earning, or for improving and modernising an existing business without acquiring a permanent asset or enduring advantage, is revenue in character. The trip was undertaken to understand new designs and manufacturing methods for a product the assessee was already making, and the proposed collaboration was never acted upon. No new capital asset or permanent right came into existence, and the expenditure was directed to increasing the efficiency and profitability of the existing business.
Conclusion: The expenditure was not capital expenditure; it was revenue expenditure and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure incurred to obtain technical knowledge or study improved manufacturing methods for an existing business, without acquisition of a permanent asset or enduring right, is revenue expenditure if it is part of the profit-earning process.