Court rules expenditure on feasibility report for soda ash plant not deductible as business expense

The High Court of Gujarat ruled that the expenditure incurred for obtaining a techno-economic feasibility report and consultation for a soda ash plant was rightly disallowed as capital expenditure for a public limited company in the assessment year 1973-74. The Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision that such expenditure, aimed at acquiring a new asset, was capital in nature and could not be deducted under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the expenditure was correctly disallowed as capital expenditure, agreeing with the Tribunal's assessment.

---

---

Issues involved: Whether the expenditure incurred for obtaining a techno-economic feasibility report and consultation for a soda ash plant can be considered as revenue expenditure or capital expenditure.

Summary:
The High Court of Gujarat considered the case of a public limited company for the assessment year 1973-74, where the company claimed deduction of amounts paid for obtaining a techno-economic feasibility report and consultation fees as revenue expenditure. The Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner considered the expenditure as capital expenditure for expanding the business. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld this view, stating that the establishment of a new unit, even if part of the existing business, would constitute capital expenditure. The Court was tasked with determining whether the Tribunal's decision was correct in law.

To be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the expenditure must be revenue in nature, laid out exclusively for business purposes, and not covered by specific sections of the Act. The Tribunal found that the company's expenditure was for acquiring a new asset, making it capital in nature. The Court agreed with this finding, stating that once an expenditure is for acquiring a capital asset, it cannot be deducted u/s 37. Citing relevant case law, the Court held that the expenditure in question was rightly disallowed as capital expenditure, affirming the Tribunal's decision.

In conclusion, the Court answered the question referred to them in the affirmative, stating that the expenditure for obtaining the techno-economic feasibility report and consultation for the soda ash plant was rightly disallowed as capital expenditure. The reference was answered accordingly, with no order as to costs.

---