Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether brass scrap arising in the manufacture of LPG cylinder valves could be treated as an input or partially processed input for the purpose of removal under Rule 57F(2), and whether the earlier view permitting such removal required reconsideration.
Analysis: Rule 57F(2) was understood as permitting removal of inputs as such or after processes undertaken in the course of their conversion into final products. Brass scrap was held not to retain the identity of brass rods and was viewed as a residual product arising in the course of manufacture, not as a partially processed input. The reasoning also accepted that the revenue effect could differ depending on whether the job worker could take credit, so the matter could not be treated as revenue-neutral in all situations. In light of the conflict with earlier decisions, the earlier view was considered to require reconsideration by a larger bench.
Conclusion: Brass scrap was not treated as a partially processed input under Rule 57F(2), and the earlier contrary view was held to require reconsideration before a larger bench.
Final Conclusion: The matter was not finally determined on the substantive levy issue and was sent for consideration by a larger bench.
Ratio Decidendi: Scrap arising in the course of manufacture does not retain the character of the original input for the purpose of removal under Rule 57F(2), which is confined to inputs as such or after processes undertaken in their conversion into final products.