Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 205/88 for goods cleared as solar flat plate collector, when the appellant was found to be manufacturing only toughened glass sheets.
Analysis: The exemption notification granted relief only to solar flat plate collectors. The record did not establish that the appellant manufactured or supplied all parts of the collector, including the toughened glass sheets as part of the complete collector. The evidence, including the departmental scientific opinion, showed that the appellant's product was only toughened glass sheets and not the exempted final product. As an exemption notification operates as an exception, it must be construed strictly.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to the exemption, and the denial of benefit under Notification No. 205/88 was correct.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption confined to a complete specified product cannot be extended to a component or input merely because it may form part of that product, and such notifications must be strictly construed.